Usage with TypeScript
This guide explains handling the edge cases that can occur while using aeternity SDK in a TypeScript project.
Firstly, ensure you've set up TypeScript according to the installation guide.
Extract types of methods exposed by SDK
SDK doesn't expose types separately to reduce the number of exports and simplify tracking of breaking changes. But you may need these types to prepare parameters or to hold the return value. In such cases, it is advised to use TypeScript-provided generics Parameters
and ReturnType
. For example,
import { walletDetector } from '@aeternity/aepp-sdk';
type WDCallback = Parameters<typeof walletDetector>[1];
type Wallet = Parameters<WDCallback>[0]['newWallet'];
let wallet: Wallet | null = null;
const stop = walletDetector(connection, ({ newWallet }) => {
wallet = newWallet;
stop();
});
The same for ReturnType
:
import { unpackDelegation } from '@aeternity/aepp-sdk';
type DlgUnpacked = ReturnType<typeof unpackDelegation>;
let delegation: DlgUnpacked | null = null;
delegation = unpackDelegation(
'ba_+EYDAaEBXXFtZp9YqbY4KdW8Nolf9Hjp0VZcNWnQOKjgCb8Br9mhBV1xbWafWKm2OCnVvDaJX/R46dFWXDVp0Dio4Am/Aa/Z2vgCEQ==',
);
Initialize parameters with specific types
You may need to define an object with parameters to call an sdk method. Obvious to try it as
import { packEntry, EntryTag } from '@aeternity/aepp-sdk';
const gaAuthData = {
tag: EntryTag.GaMetaTxAuthData,
fee: 766e11,
txHash: 'th_2CKnN6EorvNiwwqRjSzXLrPLiHmcwo4Ny22dwCrSYRoD6MVGK1',
};
const gaAuthDataPacked = packEntry(gaAuthData);
The problem in this case, is that TypeScript will generalize the type of unpackedEntry.txHash
to string
instead of th_${string}
making it incompatible with arguments of packEntry
. To fix this you may define gaAuthData
's type explicitly, like:
import { Tag, Encoded } from '@aeternity/aepp-sdk';
interface GaAuthData {
tag: Tag;
fee: number;
txHash: Encoded.TxHash;
}
const gaAuthData: GaAuthData = {
tag: EntryTag.GaMetaTxAuthData,
fee: 766e11,
txHash: 'th_2CKnN6EorvNiwwqRjSzXLrPLiHmcwo4Ny22dwCrSYRoD6MVGK1',
};
Or to define gaAuthData
as immutable:
const gaAuthData = {
tag: EntryTag.GaMetaTxAuthData,
fee: 766e11,
txHash: 'th_2CKnN6EorvNiwwqRjSzXLrPLiHmcwo4Ny22dwCrSYRoD6MVGK1',
} as const;
In the last case, txHash
's type will be exactly "th_2CKnN6EorvNiwwqRjSzXLrPLiHmcwo4Ny22dwCrSYRoD6MVGK1"
, making it compatible with packEntry
.
Narrow the union type returned by unpackTx
, unpackDelegation
, and unpackEntry
Some sdk methods return a union of multiple types. For example, unpackTx
returns a union of all supported transaction fields. To work correctly you need to narrow this type to a specific transaction before accessing its fields. For example,
import { unpackTx, Tag } from '@aeternity/aepp-sdk';
const encodedTx =
'tx_+F0MAaEB4TK48d23oE5jt/qWR5pUu8UlpTGn8bwM5JISGQMGf7ChAeEyuPHdt6BOY7f6lkeaVLvFJaUxp/G8DOSSEhkDBn+wiBvBbWdOyAAAhg9e1n8oAAABhHRlc3QLK3OW';
const tx = unpackTx(encodedTx);
if (tx.tag !== Tag.SpendTx) {
throw new Error(`Unknown transaction type: ${Tag[tx.tag]}`);
}
console.log(tx.amount);
Without checking the tx.tag
TypeScript will fail with
Property 'amount' does not exist on type 'TxUnpackedSignedTx1 & { tag: Tag; }'.
The above check is also implemented in unpackTx
itself, instead of checking the tx.tag
you can provide Tag in the second argument:
const tx = unpackTx(encodedTx, Tag.SpendTx);
But if you need to get SpendTx properties inside a SignedTx you still need to use the above tag
check.
You may find that unpackTx
is a generic function so that it can be executed as
const tx = unpackTx<Tag.SpendTx>(encodedTx);
The problem is that JavaScript won't check if the transaction is a SpendTx, so provide Tag.SpendTx
as the second argument instead (as the above).
Functions to assert types of user-provided data
Let's assume we need to receive an address from the user to send some coins to it. The user enters an address in a text box, we can get it as a string. spend
method accepts the address as Encoded.AccountAddress
, it won't accept a general string. We can overcome this restriction by adding a type assertion, like:
await aeSdk.spend(100, address as Encoded.AccountAddress);
The problem is that TypeScript won't check if address
is an ak_
-encoded string, and the spend
method will fail in this case.
A more accurate solution would be to check the address
in advance, providing user feedback if it is incorrect. For example:
import { isEncoded, Encoding } from '@aeternity/aepp-sdk';
if (!isEncoded(address, Encoding.AccountAddress)) {
alert('The address is not valid');
return;
}
await aeSdk.spend(100, address);
Please note that this method doesn't require explicit casting string
to Encoded.AccountAddress
because isEncoded
implicitly marks address
as ak_${string}
in case it returns true
.
Additionally, you can use isEncoded
to validate data against other address types:
import { Encoding } from '@aeternity/aepp-sdk';
isEncoded(address, Encoding.ContractAddress, Encoding.OracleAddress);
Or encoding types in general:
isEncoded(address, Encoding.Transaction);
AENS name validation
The similar way isName
can be used
import { isName } from '@aeternity/aepp-sdk';
console.log(isName('name.chain')); // true
console.log(isName('мир.chain')); // true
console.log(isName('🙂.chain')); // false
If you don't need to handle invalid names specially then you can use ensureName
:
import { ensureName, Name } from '@aeternity/aepp-sdk';
const nameAsString: string = readName();
ensureName(nameAsString);
const name = new Name(nameAsString, options);
Doing this way, ensureName
will throw an exception if nameAsString
is not a proper AENS name. TypeScript will handle nameAsString
as ${string}.chain
in lines below ensureName
invocation.
Check types of contract methods
By default, it is allowed to call any method of the Contract
instance. You can enable type-checking by providing a contract interface in a generic parameter of Contract
. For example:
import { Contract } from '@aeternity/aepp-sdk';
const sourceCode = `
include "String.aes"
contract Test =
entrypoint foo(x: int) = x
entrypoint bar(x: map(string, int)) = x
datatype name = FirstName(string) | LastName(string)
entrypoint baz(n: name) =
switch(n)
FirstName(first) => String.length(first)
LastName(_) => abort("Last name not supported yet")
`;
const contract = await Contract.initialize<{
foo: (v: bigint) => bigint;
bar: (x: Map<string, bigint>) => Map<string, bigint>;
baz: (v: { FirstName: [string] } | { LastName: [string] }) => number;
}>({
...aeSdk.getContext(),
sourceCode,
});
await contract.$deploy([]);
console.log((await contract.foo(21n)).decodedResult); // 42
console.log((await contract.bar(new Map([['test', 10n]]))).decodedResult); // Map(1) { 'test' => 10n }
console.log((await contract.baz({ FirstName: ['Nikita'] })).decodedResult); // 6
If you need to define the contract interface separately then extend ContractMethodsBase
:
import { ContractMethodsBase } from '@aeternity/aepp-sdk';
interface FooContract extends ContractMethodsBase {
foo: (v: bigint) => bigint;
bar: (x: Map<string, bigint>) => Map<string, bigint>;
baz: (v: { FirstName: [string] } | { LastName: [string] }) => number;
}
const contract = await Contract.initialize<FooContract>({
...aeSdk.getContext(),
sourceCode,
});
It is theoretically possible to generate a contract interface by ACI. But unfortunately, it is not supported currently.